TenFPS
2012-06-30, 04:06
imyoboogieman http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/ImYoBoogieMan/stats/186302291/
the battlereport http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/battlereport/show/36371234/1/240588670/
wasn't really able to research at first - not enough time - too busy arguing with people about why we were nuking, etc...
during the match I noticed he kept killing me with 1 or 2 shots with the m5k (a pdw) and found that a bit odd... checking his profile out he's an average to poor player with a sub 1.0 KDR but he went 102/29 that match... checking bf3stats out and his m5k kills - he has near 90% hits to kills with that weapon, which is impossible even with 100% headshots without using a damage hack.
These types of hacks aren't always easy to spot - it's obvious he just got his hacks and started using them (reflected by his poor KDR) but he made the mistake of using a new weapon with the damage hack so the statistics are very clear. If he had used a weapon that was already heavily used it wouldn't be easy to see it at first.
Anyhow - I think this is an obvious case.
Regards,
the battlereport http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/battlereport/show/36371234/1/240588670/
wasn't really able to research at first - not enough time - too busy arguing with people about why we were nuking, etc...
during the match I noticed he kept killing me with 1 or 2 shots with the m5k (a pdw) and found that a bit odd... checking his profile out he's an average to poor player with a sub 1.0 KDR but he went 102/29 that match... checking bf3stats out and his m5k kills - he has near 90% hits to kills with that weapon, which is impossible even with 100% headshots without using a damage hack.
These types of hacks aren't always easy to spot - it's obvious he just got his hacks and started using them (reflected by his poor KDR) but he made the mistake of using a new weapon with the damage hack so the statistics are very clear. If he had used a weapon that was already heavily used it wouldn't be easy to see it at first.
Anyhow - I think this is an obvious case.
Regards,